If I ever write a book (a non fiction account of the SoCal social order) this will be its' title. (all credit to someone else) It's catchy and it does generally represent the usefulness and futility of the area's roadways - when everyone is trying to go somewhere, no one gets anywhere, and besides, half of you driving somewhere don't really have anywhere to go!
Los Angeles to me seems to bear more than a passing resemblance to Sao Paolo, another teeming tropical metropolis. The higher you are in elevation, the wealthier (and safer) you are. Of course, the last time I went shopping in SP, there were more armed guards than customers and the woman next to me let her yorkie play in a pile of $1,000 sweaters - it was a lot more humble at the Beverly Center last time I checked.
The divide between haves and have-nots out here is still pretty staggering. Not that NYC lacks a sizeable population of overpaid jacka$$es (ahem, Wall St, not to mention the boldface names of Madison Ave), it's just that in NY people tend to mingle more closely than they do - especially on the subway, where a homeless guy could spend his commute within earshot of a Master of the Universe and no one would flinch.
Only in America can people turn the art of conservation into conspicuous consumption. I went shopping for a car the other weekend, and decided to be a good earthling and check out the Prius. (Drives nicely, I must say, for a car that runs on a 9V battery) But the demand out here to demonstrate obvious compassion for the environment means that Toyota can charge 15-20% ABOVE the sticker price for said vehicle.
Do the math - I could buy 2 x Corollas or 3 X Chevy Aveos (HAHAHAHAHAHA) for the same price, with 80% of the fuel efficiency. Listen, if "Pretty Woman" and "The Aviator" want to demonstrate their envronmental conscience, they should ride a bike. I think Mr Cynic, Larry David, exemplifies the logic (nee, sillyness) in this. His TV persona drives a hybrid. But in real life: a Lexus.
M